Women Relating to the Passion of Christ
From a Seminar on
Supportive Relationships
by
Rev. Fr. Stépanos Dingilian, Ph.D.
Rev. Fr. Stépanos Dingilian, Ph.D. © 2004
Could
there be something about the Christian Faith that made the women very supportive
of Christ during his Passion? When we read the Bible, we may get the impression
that the women were more supportive of Christ than the men. For instance, during
the Crucifixion, the women were standing next to him whereas most of the
Disciples, except for one, had ran away: “Near
the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of
Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple
whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Dear woman, here is
your son," and to the disciple, "Here is your mother." From that
time on, this disciple took her into his home.”
(St. John 19:25-27)
After the burial, the women went to anoint the body as opposed to the
men: “After
the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other
Mary went to look at the tomb.” (St. Matthew
28:1) Is
this impression real? Could there have been something about the preaching of
Christ that made more sense to the women that perhaps did not at first
connect with the men? What could this have been?
It is interesting that when
Christ came to Jerusalem for the last time before the Crucifixion, he stated: "O Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I
have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under
her wings, but you were not willing." (St.
Matthew 23:37) In other words, Christ likened himself to a nurturing mother hen
trying to gather her brood. Perhaps it is this nurturing aspect of Christ’s
preaching that the women were able to relate to, made sense to them. The men
however were more used to the spontaneous and immediate action. Just imagine the
energy of St. Peter when he states: "Even
if all fall away on account of you, I never will."
(St. Matthew 26:33) When Jesus stated that St. Peter will disown him, St.
Peter still went on:
"Even if I have to die with you, I will never
disown you." (St. Matthew 26:35) On the one
hand, we do not hear such great declarations from the women, but they end up
next Christ at his Crucifixion.
Perhaps,
the women were able to connect to the graceful non-violent approach that Christ
demonstrated: “Here is my servant, whom I uphold,
my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring
justice to the nations. He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the
streets. A bruised reed he will not break, and a smoldering wick he will not
snuff out.” (Book of Isaiah 42:1-3) In contrast
the men tried to show more physical support: “When
Jesus' followers saw what was going to happen, they said, "Lord, should we
strike with our swords?" And one of them struck the servant of the high
priest, cutting off his right ear. But Jesus answered, "No more of
this!" And he touched the man's ear and healed him.”
(St. Luke 22:49-51) The men were simply not used to this approach to bringing
about victory and to building a kingdom. They expected Christ to be more
confrontational and show greater physical resistance. Thus,
it would make sense that the women seemed to have seen more common sense in the
approach that Christ showed in his approach before the Crucifixion than the men
would have. After the Crucifixion and Ascension however, it seems that the men
also so the wisdom and grace in the approach of Christ and gave their life
willingly. Perhaps the women had a greater acceptance than men that the struggle
and victory through love involves suffering and perseverance.
It
is interesting that this nurturing approach of the Christianity was not only for
the spread of the Faith prior to the Ascension, but remained paramount
afterwards as well. This sense of nurturing becomes very apparent when we
consider the work of the Holy Spirit, the third Person of the Holy Trinity. The
Church Creed describes the Holy Spirit as living in and preaching through the
Patriarchs, the Prophets, and the Apostles, and preaching the Gospel. The Book
of Acts is named “Acts” because it demonstrates the action
of the Holy Spirit through the faithful … men and women. One of the older
Church writings states that the Holy Spirit speaks through the tongues of human
beings. Thus, in all these instances, instead of taking an apparent, visible,
and confrontational approach, the Holy Spirit nurtures, inspires, guides, and
strengthens the human being so that he or she, the human being would act. These
are supportive functions to which women can relate more than men. Perhaps
it is for this reason that during the early period of Christianity the women
were a very important factor in the spread, growth, and establishment of the
Faith.
Does his mean that women are
closer to the Christian Faith than men? Not necessarily. Rather, it implies that
for the men who have to compete in the arenas of this world and have to resort
to what would be considered “normal competitive behavior,” the Christian way
of struggle and victory could seem to be rather awkward and out of sync with
reality. Perhaps this is why Christ stated: “For
the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are
the people of the light.” (St. Luke 16:8)
However, once recognized and understood, then men as well as women are able to
dedicate themselves to the Faith. The initial difference in the approach between
the heavenly and the earthly eventually turns into an approach that transforms
the earthly and brings about a victory for the heavenly. As one of the Saints
stated: “The Divine took upon himself humanity, so that humanity would become
divine.” Still though, is it possible that the Christian way of influencing
and guiding towards victory may at first be easier to relate to for women? Is
this possibly why we see more women in the Church than men? What does this mean
for your faith and the faith of the one whom you love, especially if you are a
woman?
* * * * *